Analyses of Animal Carcinogenicity Experiments
This project was supported by NIH grant 1 R29 CA77289 (1998-2003).
Hongshik Ahn is the PI, and two graduate research assistants
have been working on this research. This research was in
collaboration with Ralph Kodell and James Chen and Hojin Moon
at the National Center
for Toxicological Research, FDA. We are studying the following problems.
- Attribution of tumor lethality in the absence of cause-of-death
information: A new statistical approach is developed for estimating the
carcinogenic potential of drugs and other chemical substances used by humans.
Improved statistical methods are developed for rodent tumorigenicity assays
that have interval sacrifices but not cause-of-death or
context-of-observation data. Development of a suitable statistical
procedure for testing in studies that have only a single terminal sacrifice
is investigated. These methods account explicitly for the uncertainty in
cause-of-death assignment and could relieve the need for case-by-case
assignment of cause of death or context of observation by pathologists.
Hence, these methods could result in substantial economic savings.
- Estimation of the lag time between onset of and death from an
occult tumor: We developed a method of calculating a representative
estimate of the elapsed time between the time to onset of an occult tumor
and the time that it causes the death of an animal. By applying this method
to the PCR (Project on Caloric Restriction) data, the effect of the caloric
restriction is investigated. The difference in the development of a
certain disease between the caloric restriction group and the normal
diet group is examined. Although the mechanisms of the bodies of the
rats and human are different, the results of this study can be used to
predict the human dietary effect.
- Trend tests for dose-response analysis: We developed
a statistically powerful testing method of evaluating treatment effects at
several doses of a test drug in a sequential fashion. The performance of our
procedure is evaluated and compared with other existing procedures.
The intent of the procedure is to characterize the general shape of the
dose-response relationship.